Tennessee Law Requiring Drug Tests for Welfare Recipients Faces Questions

Tennessee’s new law requiring drug testing for welfare recipients, which Governor Bill Haslam said he will sign, faces constitutional questions, according to The Tennessean. It is unclear who will pay for the testing program, the article notes.

The law is similar to those recently passed or being considered in a number of other states. Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin this week signed into law a bill that requires welfare applicants to submit to drug testing when they apply for welfare benefits.

Critics of the bills point out that courts have struck down similar programs on the grounds they amount to an unconstitutional search. Laws passed in Florida and Michigan, which allowed drug testing without any prior suspicion, were either ruled unconstitutional or challenged in court. Federal judges said the tests did not provide probable cause for conducting a search, which is required by the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment.

Ed Rubin, Professor of Law and Political Science at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, said he thinks the law does not provide any probable cause. He noted that the Fourth Amendment does allow mandatory drug testing for people seeking certain jobs, such as airplane pilots and machinery operators, which can affect public safety. “That rationale is completely lacking here,” he said, referring to the Tennessee law. “There is no plausible public safety argument from the general Fourth Amendment.”

The Tennessee chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU-TN) opposes the bill. The group sent a letter to Governor Haslam urging him to veto it.  Hedy Weinberg, ACLU-TN Executive Director, said in a news release that presuming that welfare applicants “are more likely to use drugs than scholarship applicants, farmers, legislators or anyone else receiving government funds is not only an insulting stereotype contradicted by actual research, it’s constitutionally suspect.”

3 Responses to Tennessee Law Requiring Drug Tests for Welfare Recipients Faces Questions

  1. J. Wyatt | May 25, 2012 at 1:27 pm

    I agree this is sterotyping. If we are a “free” country (which clearly this is a lie) then an individual is “free” to do as they wish in their free time. Therefore, this country is not free. Because as horrible as it may be, being told what a person can or cannot consume is control, hence NOT FREE. Let’s stop pretending we are free. We are free as long as we do as we are told. Example: Wearing seat belts. We put forth laws in the name of “safety” to control the people, and sadly we have been so dumbed down the American people can’t see it. Our WW2 vets would turn over in their graves if they saw how their life sacrifice has been destroyed. Only the close minded will disagree.

  2. misty harris | July 8, 2012 at 2:39 pm

    Yes it is stereotyping.What about cigarettes and alcohol.That’s right the state gets taxes for that.It is ok to get drunk and spend food stamps or smoke cancer sticks.What about the legal dope like methadone clinics.Here in savannah you go in get your methadone and drive off with you kids in the back seat. GOVERNOR HASLAM YOU ARE A SHAME.

  3. D. Smithson | April 7, 2013 at 8:19 pm

    I am a federal employee and rarely even take an aspirin, yet we get called in for random drug testing WHENEVER, without “cause”. If I am WORKING FOR A LIVING, paying for these people who are NOT, someone better darn well find it unconstitutional for ME TOO. Until MY random drug testing is made unfair, welfare recipients – GET YOUR PEE CUPS READY!

Leave a Reply

Please read our comment policy and guidelines before you submit a comment. Your email address will not be published. Thank you for visiting Join Together.

Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>