Top Menu

Smokers Easily Identify “Light” Cigarettes Despite Federal Ban: Study


Smokers can easily identify “light” and “mild” cigarettes, despite a federal law banning those words, because tobacco companies have substituted color names for those terms, a new study concludes.

The companies have used this color-coding to evade the ban on misleading wording, and to convey the false message that these products are safer than “regular” cigarettes, say researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health. They published their findings in Tobacco Control.

Tobacco companies began making “light” cigarettes following the U.S. Surgeon General’s 1964 report that concluded cigarette smoking causes disease, Science Daily reports. These cigarettes have ventilation holes that allow air to mix with smoke. The companies said this design limited the amount of smoke a person inhaled. In 2001, the National Cancer Institute found smokers make up for the lower smoke yield by smoking more intensely, more often or by blocking the holes with their fingers or lips. The result is they ingest as much tar and nicotine as when they smoke regular cigarettes.

The Food and Drug Administration banned use of “light” and similar terms from cigarette packaging in 2009, as part of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

The Harvard researchers found tobacco maker Philip Morris substituted color names for the previous terms. “Marlboro Light” became “Marlboro Gold,” while “Marlboro Mild” was renamed “Marlboro Blue,” and Marlboro Ultra-light” became “Marlboro Silver.” Other tobacco companies made similar name changes. The cigarettes themselves remained unchanged.

The study found in a survey, 82 percent of smokers said it was very easy to identify their usual brand of cigarette, and 10 percent found it somewhat easy. This means they still thought of certain brands as “light,” even though the packages did not use that word, the researchers said.

1 Response to this article

  1. Fr. Jack Kearney / March 14, 2013 at 12:19 pm

    Gosh, if smokers are smart enough to figure out color coding on packages and how to increase their nicotine intake by covering holes, maybe they’re smart enough to know that there is no real health benefit in smoking “light” cigarettes. Instead of focusing on silly, ineffective regulations on packaging, how about we focus on helping smokers quit or reduce harm by pushing nicotine delivery systems that are far, far safer than smoking, e.g. snus, electronic cigarettes, etc.?

Leave a Reply

Please read our comment policy and guidelines before you submit a comment. Your email address will not be published. Thank you for visiting

9 − seven =

Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is strictly prohibited without prior consent. Photographic rights remain the property of Join Together and the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids. For reproduction inquiries, please e-mail