Young Adults Should Look for 12-Step Groups With Peers, Expert Advises

Although they make up only a small percentage of 12-step program membership, teens and young adults can benefit greatly from attending meetings for groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) or Narcotics Anonymous (NA), according to an expert from Harvard University.

Only two percent of AA and NA members are under age 20, and 13 percent are under age 30, says John Kelly, PhD, Associate Professor in Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Addiction Recovery Management Service at Massachusetts General Hospital. “Young people are a minority in these groups, so they may find it more difficult initially to identify with members who are older and have different challenges, such as children, elderly parents and job loss,” said Dr. Kelly.

Because of this potential mismatch, he recommends young people who are looking to start participating in a 12-step program, whenever possible, begin with meetings that are specially designated for young people, to help them feel connected and engaged. “After this initial engagement, however, young adults may find it more beneficial to branch out to more mixed-age meetings,” he says. “Older people are more likely to have long-term sobriety, and generally have greater life experience and wisdom. Our recent findings support the notion that age similarity is good for early engagement and for enhancing sobriety, but confers less benefit in the long term.”

At the recent National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers meeting, Dr. Kelly presented research he conducted with 300 young adults, ages 18 to 24, which looked at participation and involvement in 12-step programs following inpatient substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. He found high rates of attendance and involvement—speaking up at meetings—was correlated with even more days of abstinence. The study, published in the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence, found the effect of attendance diminished over time, but the effect of involvement increased. The study also found having contact with group members outside of meetings also benefited young adults.

John Kelly, PhD, Associate Professor in Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Addiction Recovery Management Service at Massachusetts General Hospital

John Kelly, PhD, Associate Professor in Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and Director of the Addiction Recovery Management Service at Massachusetts General Hospital

His findings suggest that merely attending community 12-step groups, while helpful, will only take a young adult’s recovery so far. “Consistent and active involvement maintains and increases the benefit of participation, resulting in sustained improvement over time,” he wrote in the journal.

A second study, which has not yet been published, found young adults who attended meetings that had at least some people in the same age range during their first three months after treatment had better abstinence rates than those who attended meetings only with older members. The age-matching effect diminished over the next nine months.

His findings with young adults are similar to those in a study Dr. Kelly published last year that found teens in addiction treatment can benefit from 12-step programs. The study included 127 teens who were outpatients in substance use disorder treatment programs. They were assessed when they entered treatment, and again three, six and 12 months later. The researchers found greater meeting attendance was independently associated with significantly better substance use outcomes. Those who were in contact with a sponsor from AA or NA or who participated verbally during meetings had an even better outcome over and above the positive effects from merely attending meetings.

Dr. Kelly also presented data from a third study, also not yet published, that followed 300 young adults with substance use disorders, half of whom also had a dual diagnosis—most commonly a mood or anxiety disorder. Overall, patients with dual diagnosis attended as much and became as involved as those with only an SUD diagnosis, but had generally worse outcomes. Those with a dual diagnosis who had a high level of involvement in a 12-step program, however, had outcomes as good as those with only a substance use disorder, Dr. Kelly says. “This suggests that, for some, a strong and active connection with AA or NA can potentially offset a worse recovery prognosis for those with a dual diagnosis.”

“The good news is that clinicians can influence the likelihood that young people will attend 12-step meetings. If they do attend, they are likely to have improved outcomes,” Dr. Kelly observes. “If they educate, prepare and actively link young people with meetings, they are likely to increase the chances for better outcomes in the year after treatment.”

4 Responses to Young Adults Should Look for 12-Step Groups With Peers, Expert Advises

  1. Anne Fletcher | June 4, 2013 at 1:49 pm

    What’s rarely pointed out and emphasized in such studies showing an association between AA involvement and abstinence rates is the the high drop-out rate over time. Yes, AA is great for some young people, but knowing that many do not affiliate, we need to inform them about the many different routes to long-term sobriety. For instance young people should also be told about other mutual help groups including SMART Recovery and Women for Sobriety; they should be offered the option of church and mental health support groups, whatever works for the individual.
    Anne Fletcher, Author of Inside Rehab and Sober for Good @annemfletcher

  2. jean | June 5, 2013 at 8:10 am

    In my many years as an adolescent addiction counselor, the only truly addicted youth that made it in recovery were involved in 12 Step. Many young people cycle through abuse and get on with their lives, but becoming a teen addict and staying in recovery is terribly difficult. I have tried to get 12 Stpe in high schools but the timing is diffcult for people in recovery to make it on high school time while working. Any support group – 12 Step or otherwise works — they just need – not require – a clean support group!

  3. Andrew Park | July 10, 2013 at 9:29 am

    Cilia, We professionals SHOULD be explaining and providing information about ALL self help groups. WE do not choose for the patient and encourage, arbitrarily, one group. I went and got the literature on all groups, and since our field and AA initially were symbiotic due to the need to produce a field of pros all at once, our culture has changed. WE (Addiction Treatment Professionals) should be educating about the internet support, self help, and diverse set of educational sites. I am so disheartened when I see that 12 STEP FACILITATION GROUPS are qualified as as evidence based. Ethically we have the responsibility to allow choice AFTER–INFORMED CONSENT!!! The supreme courts of 28 states have already ruled the unconstitutionality of mandating inpatient rehab clients to attend the nightly 12 step meeting if a LAY alternative is not provided. In other words the 12 step groups (AA or NA and CA etc.)are religious enough to warrant a violation of the constitution. Please address this ignored violation of ethics. You are a really creative journalist and I enjoy your articles very much. Evidence based study, should have been SELF HELP FACILITATION GROUPS.
    Andy Park LCSW

  4. A Chicago parent of a young adult drinker | July 13, 2013 at 12:11 pm

    Swell, but how does anyone FIND such groups???? Most of the AA meeting directories and listings we’ve seen show a cutesy name and the location and time they meet and nothing else. (The only exceptions are men-only, women-only, and non-English groups.) It’s as though every group wants to build membership by not limiting itself and so it thinks it should attempt to be all things to all people.

Leave a Reply

Please read our comment policy and guidelines before you submit a comment. Your email address will not be published. Thank you for visiting Join Together.

Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>