Top Menu

Prescription-Only Pseudoephedrine Bills Blocked in Oklahoma

/By

Bills to limit the access to a key ingredient of methamphetamine by requiring a doctor’s prescription have been killed in the Oklahoma legislature.

The Washington Post reports that narcotics agents and prosecutors, front-line advocates of the bills, found their arguments blunted by radio ads, lobbyists and a local public relations effort to resist the prescription-only plan.

Two prescription-only bills were voted down in separate House and Senate committees, with both House and Senate leadership acknowledging that it’s unlikely the issue will be revived again in 2012.

The pharmaceutical industry has succeeded in preventing prescription-only bills in Oklahoma and two other states, as well as stalling measures in two more. Lawmakers have been placed between the drug industry’s opposition to more regulation and law enforcement’s appeal to find ways to stop the growing blight of meth.

Greg Mashburn, one of several district attorneys who spoke to Oklahoma lawmakers in favor the prescription-only status, said, “Shame on the pharmaceutical companies for knowing they’re profiting off meth and pouring tons of money into this effort so they can continue to profit off of it.”

The bills pushed by Mashburn, his fellow prosecutors and drug agents target cold and allergy medications that contain pseudoephedrine, a key ingredient used to make meth. The tablet form of these products would have required a doctor’s prescription, while liquid and gel-caps could still be purchased over the counter since experts say those forms can’t be easily converted into meth.

The Consumer Healthcare Products Association, a group that represents top manufacturers and distributors of nonprescription drugs and over-the-counter medicines, is opposed to these measures, saying “We believe that requiring a prescription for these medicines containing pseudoephedrine will not solve this problem, but will only place new costs and access restrictions on law abiding Oklahomans who rely on these medicines for relief.”

2 Responses to this article

  1. Avatar of JackJack
    JackJack / February 10, 2014 at 10:47 am

    Limiting these drugs has strengthened Mexican drug cartels. No one using these drugs to make meth would actually BUY these; they would steal them. Limiting their purchase by law-abiding citizens is nothing but a sham. Government bureaucrats love to pass worthless laws like this so they can CLAIM they are doing something to prevent illegal drug use. The truth is, they are actually making the situation worse by now involving violent gangs and drug cartels in its manufacture and sale. THANK YOU CONGRESS—NOT!

  2. Avatar of David Starkey
    David Starkey / May 22, 2012 at 4:45 pm

    The pseudoephedrine lobby ( CHPA ) paid Oklahoma lawmakers around $400,000 to pass their bill which will make things worse than they are right now. We had a bill that would have ( NOT ) required any prescriptions and would have dropped meth labs by at least 70%.

    I have seen many lawmakers choose to keep letting children burn to death in meth fires just to get money for their election campaign. I saw the worst of the worst.

    I have to say that I had a few great Oklahoma lawmakers that went so far above and beyond the call of duty to get a bill passed to put a stop to our terrible meth lab problem. With 904 meth labs in 2011 you can expect the count to greatly increase with this new law.

    If you want to follow our meth lab problem you can go to my web site http://www.StopMethLabs.com

Leave a Reply

Please read our comment policy and guidelines before you submit a comment. Your email address will not be published. Thank you for visiting Drugfree.org


nine + = 12

Disclaimer:
Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is strictly prohibited without prior consent. Photographic rights remain the property of Join Together and the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids. For reproduction inquiries, please e-mail jointogether@drugfree.org.