Top Menu

Penalties Differ for Positive Marijuana Test in Southeastern Conference and NCAA

/By

Penalties for college athletes who test positive for marijuana differ between the Southeastern Conference (SEC) and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the Associated Press reports. NCAA players face a one-year suspension, while SEC players do not.

Players in the SEC get third, fourth or even fifth chances before they are removed from the team, while a positive drug test in the NCAA results in an automatic suspension, according to the AP, which examined drug policies at 11 SEC schools.

The NCAA found 22.6 percent of 20,474 student athletes who participated in an anonymous survey in 2009 admitted to using marijuana in the previous year—an increase from 21.2 percent in 2005.

In 2009-2010, 1,645 student athletes were tested, and 4.3 percent were found positive for marijuana, up from 1.6 percent the previous year.

There have been several recent highly publicized SEC drug cases. Louisiana State University player Tyrann Mathieu was suspended one game for violating the team’s drug policy last year, while Georgia All-American safety Bacarri Rambo could miss one or two games next season for failing a drug test.

At the University of Mississippi, a second positive drug test may result in the loss of free tickets for family, and/or community service. A third positive test requires that a player be suspended for three games or events. Subsequent violations call for an additional three-game suspension, although the athletic director and head coach can dismiss the athlete or decide not to renew the scholarship. The school’s new athletic director, Ross Bjork, says he hopes to strengthen the policy this summer.

According to SEC Commissioner Mike Slive, a conference-wide standard has been discussed at least twice in the last 10 years, but league members have so far decided against it.

1 Response to this article

  1. maxwood / June 4, 2012 at 8:23 pm

    Are they afraid cannabis will give users an advantage in competitive sports (performance-enhancing drug theory)? Or is this policy just another sneaky way to protect alcohol and tobacco industry profits? (Ever notice how much beer advertising there is associated with college football?) Aside from thoughts of a sports career, just from standpoint of health (remember all those concussion injuries) some honest handwork making useful products, or planting trees out in the brownfields, is a healthier way for cannabis users to exercise than playing those butthead ballgames anyway.

Leave a Reply

Please read our comment policy and guidelines before you submit a comment. Your email address will not be published. Thank you for visiting Drugfree.org

Disclaimer:
Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is strictly prohibited without prior consent. Photographic rights remain the property of Join Together and the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids. For reproduction inquiries, please e-mail jointogether@drugfree.org.