Top Menu

Number of People Seeking Addiction Treatment Could Double Under New Health Law


The number of people seeking addiction treatment could double under the Affordable Care Act, the Associated Press reports. Under the new law, four million people with drug and alcohol problems will become eligible for insurance coverage. The surge of new patients is likely to strain the substance abuse treatment system, the AP notes.

How many new patients will seek addiction treatment will depend in part on how many states decide to expand their Medicaid programs.

“There is no illness currently being treated that will be more affected by the Affordable Care Act than addiction,” Tom McLellan, CEO of the nonprofit Treatment Research Institute, told the AP. “That’s because we have a system of treatment that was built for a time when they didn’t understand that addiction was an illness.”

The new law designates addiction treatment as an “essential health benefit” for most commercial insurance plans, meaning the plans must cover it.

Substance abuse treatment is to a large extent publicly funded, and run by counselors who have limited medical training, according to the article. Programs are already running over capacity in many places, and have been hit by government budget cuts. The increase in patients could result in long waiting lists, treatment agencies warn.

According to the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 23.1 million people ages 12 and older needed treatment for an illicit drug or alcohol use problem last year, but only 2.5 million received treatment at a specialty facility. About one-quarter of those who need treatment but do not receive it lack insurance, according to the article.

7 Responses to this article

  1. Avatar of Dawn Garrett
    Dawn Garrett / October 18, 2013 at 3:14 pm

    Drug addiction is such a slippery animal that our current system has low success rate. (I sponsor a huge number of graduates and the treatment only sticks on a small percentage.) What seems to be the part not addressed is coping skills and depression. I know that our local treatment center which is state funded loads them up with carbs, has no exercise facility and expects them to not be depressed. When faced with losing something that makes you temporarily happy, or at least not sad, one would thing the program would attempt to address this huge issue. Seems like one must really need relief to trade these brief respites for the horrific destruction.

  2. dean hale / September 24, 2013 at 2:20 pm

    Expanding criteria is a good start.

  3. Avatar of Andy Lujan
    Andy Lujan / September 20, 2013 at 7:10 am

    Insurance companies have not yet realized the cost savings in covering and utilizing sober living homes in conjuction with outpatient substance abuse treatment not only as a positive cost saving effective alternative to costly impatient treatment. We have successfully assisted thousands of afflicted substance abusing individuals arrest their addictions and positively drastically improved living skills and have recovered. The criminal drug courts statistics show that this model works and saves millions of dollars and lives every year.

  4. Avatar of Sandra
    Sandra / September 17, 2013 at 8:39 am

    Yes, that is something a topic to debate. Still, there is an uncertainty on whether a patient really in need would receive the treatment or not. Expanding eligibility criteria is not enough in this regard.

  5. Rob Fleming / September 12, 2013 at 2:56 pm

    The critical word here is “eligible”. They won’t strain the system if they don’t seek treatment and they won’t seek treatment without an effective “no wrong door” policy and social marketing comparable to that for breast cancer or HIV/AIDS. I exchanged emails this morning with a reasonably-intelligent, politically-connected activist who still buys into “they have to want it” and “they have to hit bottom”. So much for decades of work on intervention.

  6. Avatar of joseph umana
    joseph umana / September 13, 2013 at 5:08 pm

    Yes they do have to have a desire to stay clean an sober but nobody can judge that persons desire nobody.And not everybody has the same bottom when this disease strikes someone in there family then an only then will they realize how wrong they where.

  7. Avatar of Rob Mason
    Rob Mason / September 14, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    Your friend is right, though. You can intervene all you want; the person is not going to benefit from treatment if treatment is not what that person wants. And forcing someone into rehab against their will is improper intervention; it’s tyrannical and should not be supported. Drug prohibition policies have done no favors for the People of this country, and with the consistent statistics of repeat offenders, the Criminal Justice System’s effectiveness at rehabilitation has only proven itself to be miniscule and mediocre at best.

Leave a Reply

Please read our comment policy and guidelines before you submit a comment. Your email address will not be published. Thank you for visiting

five + 7 =

Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is strictly prohibited without prior consent. Photographic rights remain the property of Join Together and the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids. For reproduction inquiries, please e-mail