Missouri Governor Signs Bill Authorizing Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients

Missouri Governor Jay Nixon has signed into law a bill that requires drug screening for people applying for or receiving welfare benefits.

Under the new law, a person who tests positive or refuses to undergo testing and does not complete a substance abuse program will lose benefits for three years, KMOX reports. If the person participates in a substance abuse program and does not test positive for at least six months, he or she can keep their benefits.

To protect children in families who have lost benefits under the new law, the state will appoint a third party to receive benefits on behalf of the children.

On the federal level, a bill introduced in the House by Louisiana Republican Charles Boustany would require drug testing for anyone applying for or receiving benefits under the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. A similar bill, proposed in the Senate by Utah Republican Orrin Hatch, died last year.

Comments

15 Responses to Missouri Governor Signs Bill Authorizing Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients

  1. Chris Fruitrich | July 14, 2011 at 2:14 pm

    I wonder if Gov. Nixon or his legislature gave “real life” thought to this bill. I’m sure all its supporters felt they held the moral high ground with their get-tough-on-addicts stand.
    But I believe if we cut off all support systems for the homeless, dispossessed or jobless who smoke a joint now and then, that they will turn to crime to help eat and/or support their habit.
    That does not make our neighborhoods safer and it further divides the haves from the have nots.

    • Dan Cook, LISAC | July 14, 2011 at 2:48 pm

      Or it could help them “hit bottom” and decide to get help for there drug problem… :)

      • linda vandeveer | July 14, 2011 at 5:15 pm

        its not that simple, not everyone is going to find recovery;)

  2. john | July 14, 2011 at 3:44 pm

    Get real they are already commiting crimes TANF doesn’t give you enough money for anything. They have to choose Food or Drugs it won’t pay for both. Addicts need consequences or they won’t get clean.

    • linda vandeveer | July 14, 2011 at 5:13 pm

      this is not what will help them. they still need to eat. we are suppose to be the good samaritan to the suffering people not jail them or though them in the pit. they are already there. think about the potatoe famine !! this country is way off track.

  3. Elisa Schneider | July 15, 2011 at 4:19 pm

    Hey, I am all for accountability…..but lose benefits for three years? Here in NY State we have graduated sanctions…..45 days first time, ….etc, up until 180 days or until compliance. We hold people accountable for their choices, but also give them a chance to seek treatment when they are ready.

  4. jeff | July 16, 2011 at 9:08 am

    It’s about time that a program like this was started. Too many people are bleeding and scamming the system dry. The downside is the fact that most people are forced into substance abuse programs that don’t want to be in. It’s like the drug courts, the most people are only going to work the program to keep out of jail. Something needs to be done to improve the welfare system and maybe this can be the pilot program and can be tweeked later.

  5. Dr. Peter Choate | July 17, 2011 at 8:12 am

    This is an example of policy designed to force rehab or force even worse poverty which in turn will increase crime and more children in foster care. It will end up costing taxpayers more. It is bad law that will have many unintended consequences.

    • Bob | February 9, 2012 at 1:34 pm

      This is correct. I am a counselor in addictions. Who pays for the drug tests? Who pays for the 900 a day inpatient, then 900 a month for a halfway house. Who pays for the children’s foster care? You can’t make one addict change. They care about nothing except their habit which is uncontrollable. The first time they used was their fault after that the drug controls them.

  6. Al Franklin | July 18, 2011 at 2:43 pm

    The large majority of people don’t do illegal drugs because they want to, they do illegal drugs because they feel they need to. Many of these individuals have an addiction and, if so, they have a disease. Everyone should show compassion for those less fortunate especially towards those citizens infected with the disease of addiction. If we hold them accountable then lets hold this country accountible for creating easy access to illegal drugs. Illegal drugs comes into this country as though it’s a legal commodity and it’s produced in this country like candy in a candy store. The State of Missouri and this country need to get its act together. FIRST, stop illegal drugs at our borders and stop the production of illegal drugs in this country. When this is finally done, we can then talk about creating laws to impose on welfare recipients regarding drug test. We all know that the State of Missouri nor the USA is capable of providing a safe and drug free society nor are they willing to provide secure borders especially when it comes to importing illegal drugs. While they’re testing the appetite for illegal drugs of WELFARE RECIPIENTS, The State of Missouri and this country NEED ITS APPETITE AND CONSUMPTION OF ILLEGAL DRUGS INTO ITS BODY TESTED. (Those who have ears need to hear and those who have eyes need to see)

    • Lisa Ross | July 18, 2011 at 7:06 pm

      This law is compassionate in that it offers treatment to those testing positive. It will help them get their lives back from the very real disease of addiction. Research shows that being compelled to attend treatment actually helps not hurts.

    • Missy | January 12, 2012 at 11:38 pm

      Most drugs was legal at some time or another. Meth for instance man made drug that was used for war fare and many of our veterans come back from war addicted and now many areas have major issues w the drug crisis. It was sold in legal forms until early 70s n the addiction drove people to illegal measures to fix their addiction. Many times over our own government has been guilty on the demise of its citzens!

  7. Gary | July 26, 2011 at 10:54 am

    Supply and demand, if you cut the number of buyers of drugs then the need to produce them lessons.The most important thing is that those who use there welfare to purchase drugs now have an option to get clean and start turning there lives around. Giving money to anyone already in a position of no self worth magnifies the problem and it breeds the same of their offspring.

  8. Taylor | August 31, 2011 at 7:08 am

    Seriously, for all of those who feel that its okay to buy drugs and do drugs while receiving state assistance, you are way off! Why should a person who is willing to get off their butt and WORK have to drug test for most jobs now but people getting benefits from the state for free shouldnt have to?? Are you serious? You probably have a crackpipe in your hand as you read this.

  9. Linda | September 2, 2011 at 5:06 pm

    State assistance to drug addicts is enabling just as families giving money to drug addicts is enabling. Anything that helps addicts to reach bottom is more humane than enabling them to continue using–it is damaging their brains, bodies, and chance of a future. If they have kids, it’s even worse. The government is trying to stop drugs, but demand keeps them coming.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the *required information where indicated below. Please read our comment policy and guidelines before you submit a comment. Thank you for visiting Join Together.

*

*