Top Menu

Commentary: Menthol – We Know It Is a Killer and The Solution is Obvious


How many times must a man look up
Before he can see the sky?
Yes, ‘n’ how many ears must one man have
Before he can hear people cry?
Yes, ‘n’ how many deaths will it take till he knows
That too many people have died?
The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind,
The answer is blowin’ in the wind.

Copyright © 1962 by Warner Bros. Inc.; renewed 1990 by Special Rider Music

The song “Blowin’ in the Wind” came to prominence during the 1960’s and it poses a series of rhetorical questions about peace, equality, war and freedom. The choral refrain – “The answer, my friend, is blowin’ in the wind” – can be interpreted as both unambiguous – the answer is so discernible it is right in your face – as it is intangible, like the wind.

With respect to tobacco use and its consequences for public health – there are many things that we know and have known since the first Surgeon’s General report on tobacco was released in 1964. Tobacco is the number one cause of preventable death and premature death in the United States. About 1,200 people die every day in the country from tobacco-related disease. We also know that cigarette prevalence rates have declined to about 20 percent nationwide –  which is good news. However, that decline has “stalled” in recent years.

This stall is due to a number of factors including use of mentholated tobacco products. Despite a 22 percent decline in overall packs of cigarettes sold between 2000 and 2005, menthol sales remained stable. Menthols are smoked disproportionately by youth and African-Americans. Amongst African American smokers, greater than 80 percent smoke menthols compared to 27 percent amongst white smokers. Many research studies have found that menthol-flavored cigarettes are a starter product for youth, possibly due to the fact that the minty taste reduces the harshness of cigarette smoke which may be more appealing to young, inexperienced smokers. We know that menthol users are less likely to successfully quit smoking than other smokers, despite increased quit attempts and intentions to quit. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cessation rates are significantly lower among Blacks (37 percent) than their white peers (51 percent).

Historically, the African American community has long been targeted disproportionately by tobacco industry advertising, promoting menthol cigarettes like the popular and omnipresent Newport and Kool brands. It then comes as no surprise that for African Americans who smoke, a stunning 83 percent smoke menthols. The disease and death that this brings upon the community cannot be underscored enough.

Tobacco manufacturers have promoted menthol cigarettes as a safer alternative to regular cigarettes. The tobacco industry has a well-documented, predatory track record of targeting menthol brands to racial and ethnic minorities and youth. Interestingly enough, while overall smoking rates have declined in the past eight years, depending on age, the proportion of smokers who use menthol cigarettes has held steady or increased.

With the passage of the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, 13 specific “candy-like flavorings” were banned. Menthol, however, was excluded from this ban. The Federal Drug Administration (FDA), the agency tasked by the law to regulate tobacco products, has been provided an opportunity to remedy this oversight. A scientific advisory group established by FDA – the Tobacco Product Scientific Advisory Committee (TPSAC) – were required to tackle the menthol question as one of the first issues it addressed and recommended in March 2011, that removal of menthol cigarettes from the marketplace would benefit public health in this country.

As of the writing of this commentary, the FDA has yet to comment on, let alone act on, the recommendations of their TPSAC, although a report is said to be in the works. There is much concern that perhaps the TPSAC’s sage advice will be ignored or that it may be compromised by tobacco industry influences. Regardless of this report and any subsequent action or inaction, Legacy will continue to support and advocate for a ban on menthol cigarettes. If menthol removal from cigarettes causes even a fraction of Americans to quit smoking or never to start – thousands of lives would be positively impacted.

The FDA needs to do the right thing and ban menthol, for adults who currently smoke and young people who may be susceptible to initiating smoking. As Bob Dylan succinctly pointed out in his iconic lyrics – how many deaths will it take till he knows that too many people have died? The answer my friend is blowing in the wind: make menthol history.

Amber E. Bullock, MPH, CHES
Executive Vice President, Program Development

6 Responses to this article

  1. Avatar of oliver twist
    oliver twist / July 28, 2012 at 8:48 am

    “The FDA needs to do the right thing and ban menthol, for adults who currently smoke and young people who may be susceptible to initiating smoking. ”

    oh come on!!!!!! America get over yourselves!

  2. maxwood / July 27, 2012 at 2:11 pm

    Much of what you say is correct, but lest we miss important opportunities some additional options must be added. The “menthol” referred to is a preparation of liquid oil from the Mentha spiccata plant or one of its relatives, sprayed on the tobacco, and what almost all cigarette smokers seem to be forgetting (guess why– it’s the advertising) is that you can legally buy DRIED PEPPERMINT at the herb store, sift it with a screen, and (A) mix the particles into a RYO joint or cigarette, (B) leave out tobacco altogether and just have a toke of peppermint— or (C) spearmint, or pennyroyal, or sage, or oregano etc.,— or finally, (D) ELIMINATE corporate hot burning overdose “cigarette papers” and switch to using a vaporizer, e-cigarette (liquid formula vaporizer) or 25-mg single-toke chillum, kiseru, midwakh, sebsi (“one-hitter”).

  3. Avatar of Chad
    Chad / July 27, 2012 at 12:59 pm

    Amber, I don’t understand why so many folks against smoking are always attacking on the fringe. Why not go for an outright ban if cigarettes are as bad as everyone knows they are? Instead, people are fighting against cigs in a pack, where they are available, flavors allowed, package labels, etc. A lot of harmful products are illegal to consume or be sold. Why not go for prohibition?

  4. Chad / July 30, 2012 at 3:22 pm

    I think I am missing what you are getting at, Maxwood. I am not trying to be a smart aleck, I really don’t get it. What does the ability of people to smoke other things have to do with tobacco prohibition? People can buy sugar and snort it, that does not mean we can’t outlaw cocaine.

  5. Avatar of Jake
    Jake / August 3, 2012 at 8:19 pm

    Chad- Prohibition NEVER works. If only politicians would realize this. Education is the only way to prevent substance abuse. Additionally, the gov’t makes millions and millions of dollars on tobacco sales every year. They will never go away.

  6. Chad / August 6, 2012 at 1:48 pm

    Jake, I agree with you. I was trying to see why people keep picking at the edges of the issue. If they think it is so bad, try to prohibit it. I think the best solution is allow people to do what they want with their bodies and be responsible for whatever results they get (their own medical care, for example). No one else should pay for their stupid decisions.

Leave a Reply

Please read our comment policy and guidelines before you submit a comment. Your email address will not be published. Thank you for visiting

− three = 5

Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is strictly prohibited without prior consent. Photographic rights remain the property of Join Together and the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids. For reproduction inquiries, please e-mail